References

Barko PC, McMichael MA, Swanson KS, Williams DA. The gastrointestinal microbiome: a review. J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32:(1)9-25 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14875

Bruce-Keller AJ, Salbaum JM, Luo M Obese-type gut microbiota induce neurobehavioral changes in the absence of obesity. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 77:(7)607-615 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.07.012

Collins SM, Kassam Z, Bercik P. The adoptive transfer of behavioral phenotype via the intestinal microbiota: experimental evidence and clinical implications. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013; 16:(3)240-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.004

Craig JM. Atopic dermatitis and the intestinal microbiota in humans and dogs. Vet Med Sci. 2016; 2:(2)95-105 https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.24

Dethlefsen L, Relman DA. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:4554-4561 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000087107

Feeding gut microbes for a healthy brain. Presented at Proceedings of the Nestlé Purina Companion Animal Nutrition Summit: The Nexus of Human and Pet Nutrition, Vancouver, Canada, May 4-6 2017, 55–58. https://www.purinainstitute.com/articles/feeding-gut-microbes-healthy-brain (accessed 3 August 2020)

Honneffer JB, Minamoto Y, Suchodolski JS. Microbiota alterations in acute and chronic gastrointestinal inflammation of cats and dogs. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:(44)16489-16497 https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16489

Hooda S, Vester Boler BM, Kerr KR, Dowd SE, Swanson KS. The gut microbiome of kittens is affected by dietary protein:carbohydrate ratio and associated with blood metabolite and hormone concentrations. Br J Nutr. 2013; 109:(9)1637-1646 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512003479

Kieler IN, Molbak L, Hansen LL, Hermann-Bank ML, Bjornvad CR. Overweight and the feline gut microbiome – a pilot study. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2016; 100:(3)478-484 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12409

LeBlanc JG, Milani C, Savoy de Giori G Bacteria as vitamin suppliers to their host: a gut microbiota perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013; 24:(2)160-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.005

Lin S, Sanders DS, Gleeson JT Long-term outcomes in patients diagnosed with bile-acid diarrhoea. Eur J Gastroen Hepatol. 2016; 28:(2)240-245 https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000541

Evaluation of the effects of a 2-week treatment with metronidazole on the fecal microbiome of healthy dogs. 2015. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.12609 (accessed 3 August 2020)

Osumi T, Shimada T, Sakaguchi M, Tsujimoto H. A double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of orally administered heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis FK-23 preparation in atopic dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2019; 30:(2)127-e36 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12725

Parracho HM, Bingham MO, Gibson GR, McCartney AL. Differences between the gut microflora of children with autistic spectrum disorders and that of healthy children. J Med Microbiol. 2005; 54:(10)987-991 https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46101-0

Purina Institute. Understanding probiotics. 2019a. https://www.purinainstitute.com/science-of-nutrition/promoting-gastrointestinal-health (accessed 3 August 2020)

Purina Institute. The gut-brain axis. 2019c. https://www.purinainstitute.com/science-of-nutrition/promoting-gastrointestinal-health/gut-brain-axis (accessed 3 August 2020)

Transition feeding guide for clients (Commercial handout, unpublished). 2020;

Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016; 16:(6)341-352 https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.42

Rossi G, Pengo G, Caldin M Comparison of microbiological, histological, and immunomodulatory parameters in response to treatment with either combination therapy with prednisone and metronidazole or probiotic VSL#3 strains in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One. 2014; 9:(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094699

Sochocka M, Donskow-Łysoniewska K, Diniz BS The gut microbiome alterations and inflammation-driven pathogenesis of alzheimer′s disease-a critical review. Mol Neurobiol. 2019; 56:(3)1841-1851 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1188-4

Suchodolski JS, Camacho J, Steiner JM. Analysis of bacterial diversity in the canine duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon by comparative 16S rRNA gene analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008; 66:(3)567-578 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00521.x

Suchodolski JS, Dowd SE, Westermarck E The effect of the macrolide antibiotic tylosin on microbial diversity in the canine small intestine as demonstrated by massive parallel 16S rRNA gene sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2009; 9:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-210

Suchodolski JS. Intestinal microbiota of dogs and cats: a bigger world than we thought. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011; 41:(2)261-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.12.006

Suchodolski JS. Diagnosis and interpretation of intestinal dysbiosis in dogs and cats. Vet J. 2016; 215:30-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.04.011

Metabolic consequences of gut dysbiosis in dogs with IBD. https://www.purinainstitute.com/can-summit/can-2017

Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004; 558:(1)263-275 https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388

Valdes A. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018; 361 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2179

Vester B, Dalsing BL, Middelbos IS Faecal microbial populations of growing kittens fed high- or moderate-protein diets. Arch Anim Nutrit. 2009; 63:(3)254-265 https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390902860000

The gastrointestinal microbiome – what do we know now and what will we learn next?

02 December 2020
20 mins read
Volume 25 · Issue 11
Figure 1. In addition to differences in the composition of the microbiota along the gastrointestinal tract, each animal harbours a unique microbial profile (Suchodolski, 2016). Studies show that Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae are the predominant bacterial groups cultured from canine and feline intestines, although the levels found vary between different studies.
Figure 1. In addition to differences in the composition of the microbiota along the gastrointestinal tract, each animal harbours a unique microbial profile (Suchodolski, 2016). Studies show that Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae are the predominant bacterial groups cultured from canine and feline intestines, although the levels found vary between different studies.

Abstract

As a result of technological advances in recent years, particularly the advent of a number of molecular tools in the research setting, a growing body of evidence has started to elucidate the importance of the gastrointestinal microbiome in a variety of interactions with the host. It is now thought to have a number of significant effects on a host's health, including aiding digestion, providing nutritional benefits to the host, immune regulation and defence against enteropathogens. It also has extra-intestinal roles including brain development, which in turn influence appetite and behaviour. Every individual harbours a unique microbiome that is also dynamic. Genetic and environmental factors including stress, diet and antibiotics can all have a significant impact on microbiome make-up, both during development and throughout life. The gastrointestinal microbiome has also been directly implicated in the pathogeneses of both gastrointestinal and systemic disease, particularly enteropathies and diseases such as obesity. There is also a growing interest in its role in communicating with and potentially influencing brain function, referred to as the ‘microbiota–gut–brain axis’. Manipulation of the microbiome has been associated with changes in behaviour, such as the onset of anxious behaviours in dogs, mice and humans. This has also been linked to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's in humans. This article explores our current understanding of the gastrointestinal microbiome and its role in both health and disease, as well as the role that dysbiosis may play in disease states. It briefly considers ways in which we may be able to manipulate it therapeutically in companion animals. It also looks at some of the unanswered questions that remain, and considers the potential next steps for researchers.

In recent years, a growing body of evidence has started to elucidate the importance of the gastrointestinal microbiome in a variety of interactions with the host. It is now thought to have a number of significant impacts on a host's health. It has also been directly implicated in the pathogeneses of both gastrointestinal and systemic disease. Much of this research has been done in humans and rodents, accelerated by advances in the technologies available to analyse the microbiome, but an increasing number of studies are now being done on companion animals. This article explores the current understanding of the role of the gastrointestinal microbiome both in health and disease, as well as the role that dysbiosis may play in behaviour and disease states, such as gastrointestinal conditions, obesity and neurological diseases. It also briefly considers ways in which the gastrointestinal microbiome may be theraputically manipulated for companion animals. Box 1 outlines definitions of key terms used in this article.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.