References

Bianco A, Bortolami A, Miccolupo A SARS-CoV-2 in animal companions: a serosurvey in three regions of southern Italy. Life (Basel). 2023; 13:(12) https://doi.org/10.3390/life13122354

Hernández DAJ, Chacón MC, Velásquez MA Seroprevalence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in domestic dogs and cats and its relationship with COVID-19 cases in the city of Villavicencio, Colombia. F1000 Research. 2023; 11 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125780.3

Heydarifard Z, Chegeni AM, Heydarifard F, Nikmanesh B, Salimi V An overview of SARS-CoV2 natural infections in companion animals: a systematic review of the current evidence. Rev Med Virol. 2024; 34:(1) https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2512

Nilsson MG, Santana Cordeiro MC, Gonçalves ACA High seroprevalence for SARS-CoV-2 infection in dogs: age as risk factor for infection in shelter and foster home animals. Prev Vet Med. 2024; 222 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106094

Small animal review

02 June 2024
2 mins read
Volume 29 · Issue 6

Abstract

The world continues to recover from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, and although the impact of the disease has been reduced as a result of vaccination, increased immunity and less severe variants, it is still a disease of worldwide significance. Four recent studies look at the role of domestic animals in the epidemiology of the disease.

Hernandez et al (2023) noted that different animal species are possible intermediate hosts that could aid the inter-species transmission of SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in dogs and cats and evaluate its relationship to coronavirus disease in humans in Villavicencio, Colombia. The prevalence of human COVID-19 cases was compared to the seroprevalence in dogs and cats; 300 dogs and 135 cats were included in the study. The overall seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 4.6% (3.7% in dogs and 6.7% in cats). There was a weak positive correlation between COVID-19 cases in humans and the seroprevalence of the virus in dogs and cats. The authors concluded that cats were more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 than dogs. This study provides information about the inter-species dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Bianco et al (2023) also noted that, because several animal species are known to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is important to examine the occurrence of infection in domestic dogs and cats. The authors of this study performed serological screening to identify SARS-CoV-2 exposure in dogs and cats from three regions of Southern Italy during 2021 and 2022. Serum samples were collected from 89 dogs and 11 cats in 2021, and 577 dogs and 63 cats in 2022. The overall positive prevalence was 2.7%, with dogs more susceptible than cats, in contrast to the above study. However, serum neutralisation tests were only positive in two samples collected from dogs. Serologically distinct SARS-CoV-2 assays showed that there was variant-specific positivity. The authors suggested that the monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in animals might be affected by the antigenic evolution of the virus, necessitating continual updates of the tests used to detect the virus. Therefore, they recommended that variant-specific serological methods are used for serological screening studies. These types of studies are vital to determine the impact of new variants on animals, how humans might be affected, to identify virus reservoirs and monitor antigenic changes.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.