References

Bernstein JA, Tater K, Bicalho RC, Rishniw M Hair and saliva analysis fails to accurately identify atopic dogs or differentiate real and fake samples. Vet Dermatol. 2019; 30:(2)105-e28 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12716

Bethlehem S, Bexley J, Mueller RS Patch testing and allergen-specific serum IgE and IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of canine adverse food reactions. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2012; 145:(3–4)582-589 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.01.003

Bizikova P, Olivry T A randomized, double-blinded crossover trial testing the benefit of two hydrolysed poultry-based commercial diets for dogs with spontaneous pruritic chicken allergy. Vet Dermatol. 2016; 27:(4)289-e70 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12302

Cave NJ Hydrolyzed protein diets for dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2006; 36:(6)1251-vi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.08.008

Cave NJ, Guilford WG A method for in vitro evaluation of protein hydrolysates for potential inclusion in veterinary diets. Res Vet Sci. 2004; 77:(3)231-238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.04.011

Coyner K, Schick A Hair and saliva test fails to identify allergies in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2019; 60:(2)121-125 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12952

European Pet Food Industry Federation. Nutritional guidelines for complete and complementary pet food for cats and dogs. 2020. https://europeanpetfood.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Updated-Nutritional-Guidelines.pdf (accessed 24 April 2024)

European Union Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/354 of 4 March 2020 establishing a list of intended uses of feed intended for particular nutritional purposes and repealing Directive 2008/38/EC. 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32020R0354 (accessed 24 April 2024)

Favrot C, Bizikova P, Fischer N, Rostaher A, Olivry T The usefulness of short-course prednisolone during the initial phase of an elimination diet trial in dogs with food-induced atopic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol. 2019; 30:(6)498-e149 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12793

Fossati LA, Larsen JA, Villaverde C, Fascetti AJ Determination of mammalian DNA in commercial canine diets with uncommon and limited ingredients. Vet Med Sci. 2019; 5:(1)30-38 https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.125

Freeman LM, Chandler ML, Hamper BA, Weeth LP Current knowledge about the risks and benefits of raw meat-based diets for dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013; 243:(11)1549-1558 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.243.11.1549

Gaschen FP, Merchant SR Adverse food reactions in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011; 41:(2)361-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.02.005

Hagen-Plantinga EA, Leistra MH, Sinke JD, Vroom MW, Savelkoul HF, Hendriks WH Measurement of allergen-specific IgG in serum is of limited value for the management of dogs diagnosed with cutaneous adverse food reactions. Vet J. 2017; 220:111-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.009

Hand MS, Thatcher CD, Remillard RL, Roudebush P, Novotny BJ Small animal clinical nutrition, 5th edn. Topeka: Mark Morris Institute; 2010

Horvath-Ungerboeck C, Widmann K, Handl S Detection of DNA from undeclared animal species in commercial elimination diets for dogs using PCR. Vet Dermatol. 2017; 28:(4)373-e86 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12431

Jackson HA Diagnostic techniques in dermatology: the investigation and diagnosis of adverse food reactions in dogs and cats. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2001; 16:(4)233-235 https://doi.org/10.1053/svms.2001.27599

Jeffers JG, Meyer EK, Sosis EJ Responses of dogs with food allergies to single-ingredient dietary provocation. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996; 209:(3)608-611

Loeffler A, Lloyd DH, Bond R, Kim JY, Pfeiffer DU Dietary trials with a commercial chicken hydrolysate diet in 63 pruritic dogs. Vet Rec. 2004; 154:(17)519-522 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.154.17.519

Marquez BP, Larsen JA, Fascetti AJ Determination of mammalian deoxyribonucleic acid in commercial canine treats and supplements. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2022; 58:(2)77-84 https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7143

Matricoti I, Noli C An open label clinical trial to evaluate the utility of a hydrolysed fish and rice starch elimination diet for the diagnosis of adverse food reactions in dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2018; 29:(5)408-e134 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12680

Mueller RS, Olivry T Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (4): can we diagnose adverse food reactions in dogs and cats with in vivo or in vitro tests?. BMC Vet Res. 2017; 13:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1142-0

Mueller RS, Unterer S Adverse food reactions: pathogenesis, clinical signs, diagnosis and alternatives to elimination diets. Vet J. 2018; 236:89-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.04.014

Mueller RS, Olivry T, Prélaud P Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats. BMC Vet Res. 2016; 12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0633-8

Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats.Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2006

Olivry T, Bizikova P A systematic review of the evidence of reduced allergenicity and clinical benefit of food hydrolysates in dogs with cutaneous adverse food reactions. Vet Dermatol. 2010; 21:(1)32-41 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00761.x

Olivry T, Mueller RS Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (9): time to flare of cutaneous signs after a dietary challenge in dogs and cats with food allergies. BMC Vet Res. 2020; 16:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02379-3

Olivry T, Mueller RS, Prélaud P Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (1): duration of elimination diets. BMC Vet Res. 2015; 11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0541-3

Paterson S Cutaneous adverse food reactions in the dog and cat – what's new?. Comp Anim. 2021; 26:(8)192-296 https://doi.org/10.12968/coan.2020.0094

Puigdemont A, Brazís P, Serra M, Fondati A Immunologic responses against hydrolyzed soy protein in dogs with experimentally induced soy hypersensitivity. Am J Vet Res. 2006; 67:(3)484-488 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.67.3.484

Raditic DM, Remillard RL, Tater KC ELISA testing for common food antigens in four dry dog foods used in dietary elimination trials. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2011; 95:(1)90-97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01016.x

Ricci R, Granato A, Vascellari M Identification of undeclared sources of animal origin in canine dry foods used in dietary elimination trials. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013; 97:32-38 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12045

Shimakura H, Kawano K Results of food challenge in dogs with cutaneous adverse food reactions. Vet Dermatol. 2021; 32:(3)293-e80 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12953

Stockman J, Fascetti AJ, Kass PH, Larsen JA Evaluation of recipes of home-prepared maintenance diets for dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013; 242:(11)1500-1505 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.242.11.1500

Szczepanik MP, Gołyński M, Wilkołek P, Kalisz G Evaluation of a hydrolysed salmon and pea hypoallergenic diet application in dogs and cats with cutaneous adverse food reaction. Pol J Vet Sci. 2022; 25:(1)67-73 https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2022.140842

Vendramini THA, Pedrinelli V, Macedo HT Homemade versus extruded and wet commercial diets for dogs: cost comparison. PLoS One. 2020; 15:(7) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236672

Verlinden A, Hesta M, Millet S, Janssens GP Food allergy in dogs and cats: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006; 46:(3)259-273 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390591001117

Villaverde C, Chandler M Commercial vs homemade cat diets: what you need to know. J Feline Med Surg. 2022; 24:(5)415-428 https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X221090389

Weemhoff JL, MacLeay JM, Brejda J, Schiefelbein H, Wernimont SM, Gross KL Successful nutritional control of scratching and clinical signs associated with adverse food reaction: a randomized controlled COSCAD'18 adherent clinical trial in dogs in the United Kingdom. J Vet Intern Med. 2021; 35:(4)1893-1901 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16192

Willis-Mahn C, Remillard R, Tater K ELISA testing for soy antigens in dry dog foods used in dietary elimination trials. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2014; 50:(6)383-389 https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6063

Wilson SA, Villaverde C, Fascetti AJ, Larsen JA Evaluation of the nutritional adequacy of recipes for home-prepared maintenance diets for cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019; 254:(10)1172-1179 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.254.10.1172

Freeman L, Becvarova I WSAVA nutritional assessment guidelines. J Small Anim Pract. 2011; 52:(7)385-396 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01079.x

Dietary options for diagnosis of cutaneous adverse food reactions

02 October 2024
15 mins read
Volume 29 · Issue 10
Figure 1. Description of the elimination and challenge trial.
Figure 1. Description of the elimination and challenge trial.

Abstract

Diet is critical for the diagnosis of cutaneous adverse food reactions in dogs and cats. The diagnostic process consists of the elimination trial, where a diet the patient has never been exposed to or with reduced allergenicity (elimination diet) is fed for a number of weeks exclusively. If clinical signs improve, this is followed by a challenge phase to confirm the diagnosis and identify the food triggers in each patient. Therefore, choosing the right elimination diet is very important in obtaining a reliable diagnosis and deciding on the best feeding plan for long-term management. This paper reviews the different options for canine and feline elimination diets and discusses their pros and cons.

Cutaneous adverse food reactions manifest in the skin. The main clinical sign is pruritus, and reactions can involve the immune system (food allergy) or not (food intolerance) (Mueller and Unterer, 2018). Dietary management is important for both the diagnosis of this condition and for long-term management. The latter consists of feeding complete diets avoiding individual triggers, which can be identified during the diagnostic phase.

The gold standard diagnostic of cutaneous adverse food reactions consists of an elimination and challenge dietary trial (Jackson, 2001; Mueller and Unterer, 2018; Paterson, 2021) (Figure 1). The elimination phase consists of exclusively feeding the patient a diet that they have never been exposed to or with reduced allergenicity (‘elimination diet’) for at least 8 weeks (Olivry et al, 2015). The use of steroids at the start of the trial has been proposed to be useful in reducing the length by controlling the initial inflammation and pruritis (Favrot et al, 2019). After that, if the pruritus has not improved, cutaneous adverse food reactions can be ruled out and further investigations are required. The patient could still have a cutaneous adverse food reaction if the elimination diet was not adequate (for example, not novel for the patient, or containing undeclared ingredients), not fed for long enough or if there were compliance issues, such as use of treats, flavoured supplements, food scraps and the like. Those patients whose pruritus has improved would move to the challenge phase, where the patient is exposed to different ingredients or the previous diet. Using individual ingredients instead of a complete diet is helpful, as this will allow identification of the triggers to avoid. Multiple ingredients should be offered at one time, as patients can react to more than one ingredient (Jeffers et al, 1996). If the clinical signs reoccur, a cutaneous adverse food reaction can be confirmed.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.